What the Pope Knew...

I just finished watching CNN's documentary, "What the Pope Knew" - and although certainly not shocked by the revelations, was very surprised that such a news organization would take on the world's largest religion of 2.6 billion people!

Cults at the Jones Town level are much more comfortable for news exposés, especially since most of those victims are dead.

But, of course, religion is a large collection of cults. Some of those cults are benign or even constructive despite their having been built upon (I think) false premises. Others have horribly malevolent histories... especially, I’m sorry to say, the Catholic church. I don't have the space to list the attrocities committed by the church but I'm sure those of you who know her past history including the 'inquisition' period don't need to be reminded.

Religion seems to be important to many, if not most people. Recently a relative had their wedding ceremony in a Unitarian church because, although not members, thought it would be a good place for people of all denominations to assemble! So, perhaps Unitarianism is a good step toward religious freedom! However, it does profess to be a religion – as does Buddhism!

Religion, as President Jefferson knew, was beyond the province of government simply because no government can effectively mess with the indoctrinated beliefs of the masses! Fortunately, no one religion constitutes a majority and their religious beliefs and goals are so disparite that secular politics has a chance to suceed in their place, but it is always under siege!

So, what follows are a couple of opinions of the show I watched both pro and con.... enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaJE3_PYaCU

Catholics, Media, & Culture
Perspectives from the Crossroads by John W. Kennedy

I've spent the last three sessions of this blog running an interview with CNN's Gary Tuchman about his one-hour documentary entitled What the Pope Knew airing tonight at 8:00 PM ET.

As the title suggests it deals with the child sex abuse scandal that has rocked the Catholic Church and, after watching an advance copy, I can tell you that I found it to be an excellent piece of journalism.

Though I could have done without the sometimes with unnecessarily dramatic background music, the reporting itself is seems rock solid and delivers the facts in a straightforward manner that is tough but fair.

Unfortunately, the facts do convincingly show that Pope Benedict XVI (when he headed the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith during the papal reign of John Paul II) did not do all he should have done when cases of alleged child sexual abuse by priests were brought to his attention. The strong suggestion being that then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was much more sensitive to the cause of protecting that Church's reputation than to the pain of the victims of child molestation.

On the other hand, the program (which, BTW, features an interview with Msgr. Charles Scicluna of the Vatican) does take care to note that as Pope, Benedict has charted a new course for the Church that much more aggressively deals with such allegations. He has also met privately with abuse victims and has publicly apologized for the Church's decades-long failure to adequately protect children in its care from priestly abusers.

Critics, of course, say that he still hasn't done enough and that, in any event, his chief concern is still protecting the image of the Church.

Who can know what's in a man's heart? But I choose to hope (and pray) that Benedict's heart has been truly opened to the pain of the victims. It wouldn't be the first time in history God chose someone who made serious mistakes in judgment to be a positive force for healing.

And, I pray that the victims too experience healing. It was a terrible thing that was done to them -- made worse by the Church not showing the concern and compassion it should have when the crimes occurred.

At the same time, I feel compelled to note that I have seen and experienced the compassion of good priests in my life -- priests who don't deserve to be tainted by the actions of some who were, tragically, allowed to repeatedly commit heinous crimes.

While the Church is far from perfect. There are occasions of hypocrisy and corruption that need dealt with. That's certainly true of any large organization and the way the sex abuse allegations were handled does constitute a scandal within the Church.

But it is also true that the Church is filled with many, many good people who sincerely devote their lives to God by serving His people. It is possible to acknowledge both truths.

Balance requires a willingness to admit and truly come to grips with what happened (so healing can begin and necessary reforms can be made) as well a realization that the Church stands for something that is good and solid and beyond the failings of even its leaders -- and that is the love and forgiveness offered to the world through Jesus Christ.

What the Pope Knew exposes a dark period in Church history to the healing power of light and truth. And, as all Christians know, the truth shall set us free.

For many years I’ve watched Larry King (CNN) because he is a great interviewer in that he lets the ‘other guy’ speak... and he listens. Now, I am not always thrilled by those he chooses to talk to and often, after checking, go to some other source of entertainment, but I always check.

Larry King is soon to be a ‘celeb’ of the past as he is leaving his spot on TV. This week he has booked an eclectic group of interviews for his final hours which so far has been interesting - that is until tonight!

It is one thing to interview politicians and personalities... and that is good box office. But when one gets into the area of international politics and, of all people, the president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad... my God! King has guts! Ahmadinejad may look crummy and need a shave, but he is one smart cookie and was an academic before he entered Iranian politics.

Unfortunately he turned the tables and asked King leading questions about our American civil atrocities which even appeared worse than what we normally think of Iran! The interview was a disaster!

I suspect that Hillary would have been better able to handle Ahmadinejad, but certainly not Larry King! We should bear that in mind when we consider who is going to debate whom in the future! We do have some defenses, but King really was a fish out of water. It is obvious that a good interviewer is not necessarily a good debater!

King was not up to the challenge not only because he lacks the intellect of the President of Iran but he was also handicapped because he is Jewish. Normally he hides his religion or jokes about it, but in this case he became overly defensive of his religious beliefs and the Zionists of Israel who have always been hard for anyone to defend... I mean, the holocaust was a long time ago for most of us (not me, however) and did not happen in Palestine or present time Israel, but by a Catholic (Hitler was a staunch Catholic). Nor did it happen in the Middle East, but rather in northern Europe!